Skip to main content
InkfreeInkfree home

eSignature Legality in Chile

Electronic signatures have been legally recognized in Chile since 2002, under a law built around a clear general principle: electronic documents and paper documents are legally equivalent.

Governing Law

Ley 19.799 sobre Documentos Electrónicos, Firma Electrónica y Servicios de Certificación de Dicha Firma

Enacted in 2002, this is Chile's foundational law governing electronic documents and signatures. Article 1 establishes the law's guiding principles: freedom to provide services, free competition, technological neutrality, international compatibility, and, most importantly, equivalence between electronic and paper media for acts and contracts, whether entered into by individuals, companies, or state bodies.

Article 7 extends this specifically to government bodies: acts, contracts, and documents of state organs signed with an electronic signature are valid in the same way, and produce the same effects, as those issued in writing on paper, though where the document needs to function as a public instrument, an Advanced Electronic Signature is required specifically.

Firma Electrónica Simple vs. Firma Electrónica Avanzada

Firma Electrónica Simple (FES) — Simple Electronic Signature

Defined broadly as "any sound, symbol, or electronic process" that lets the recipient of an electronic document at least formally identify its author. Documents signed with FES are fully valid and treated as a private instrument (instrumento privado). If challenged in court, the party relying on the signature must prove it genuinely corresponds to the signer and reflects their intent. Chilean legal commentary is clear on what actually gets evaluated here: not the visual "drawing" of the signature, but the platform's audit log, IP address, timestamp, and notification trail.

Firma Electrónica Avanzada (FEA) — Advanced Electronic Signature

Certified by an accredited provider, created using means the signer keeps under their exclusive control, uniquely linked to both the signer and the data it relates to, and capable of detecting any later modification. Documents signed with FEA are treated as a public instrument (when the underlying document is public) and benefit from a legal presumption of authorship and integrity, the strongest evidentiary position available.

When Chilean eSignatures May Not Be Accepted

  • Acts and contracts related to family law (marriage, adoption, and similar personal-status matters)
  • Wills and certain succession documents
  • Documents requiring notarization or registration as a public instrument, where the law specifically mandates Advanced Electronic Signature or a notary's involvement
  • Real estate transfers requiring registration with the Conservador de Bienes Raíces

How Inkfree Meets Chilean Requirements

  • Firma Electrónica Simple support

    Inkfree's signing flow satisfies the FES identification requirement for the large majority of Chilean commercial contracts

  • Tamper-proof audit trail

    provides exactly the evidence Chilean courts look to when assessing an FES: IP address, timestamp, notification record, and full signing log

  • OTP and passcode authentication

    strengthens signer identification for higher-value agreements

  • Certificate of Completion

    a permanent, downloadable signing record for every document

Official Sources

This page is for general informational purposes only and isn't legal advice. Consult a qualified Chilean lawyer for guidance specific to your situation, particularly for public instruments or real estate documents.

FAQS

Questions, answered.

Common questions about eSignature legality in Chile.

Yes, as a Firma Electrónica Simple under Ley 19.799, sufficient for the large majority of Chilean commercial contracts. Documents requiring status as a public instrument need a Firma Electrónica Avanzada specifically.

A Simple signature is valid but, if challenged, the burden of proof falls on whoever relies on it. An Advanced signature, certified by an accredited provider, carries an automatic legal presumption of authorship and integrity, and is required for documents that need to function as a public instrument.

Not the visual signature itself, courts look at the underlying technical evidence: the platform's audit log, the signer's IP address, timestamps, and the notification trail showing the document was sent to and opened by the correct person.

Yes. Article 7 of Ley 19.799 specifically confirms that acts, contracts, and documents from state organs signed electronically are valid, provided an Advanced Electronic Signature is used where public-instrument status is required.

Try Inkfree Free, No Credit Card Required

Start on the Free plan and upgrade when you're ready. Every paid plan includes a 14-day trial with all premium features unlocked.